Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.015 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'that?': 0.05; 'suppose': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'ast': 0.09; '"right"': 0.16; 'benjamin': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'pypi?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'obviously': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'import': 0.21; 'do.': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'possibility': 0.27; 'module.': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; '>>>>': 0.29; 'arithmetic': 0.29; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'figure': 0.30; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'remote': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'created': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'most': 0.61; 'obvious': 0.71; '2013': 0.84; 'oscar': 0.84; 'unaware': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=L13RlR1EbJPcJQl8pjJSwzr/ZRT9goI8WrDfHiZtHjs=; b=heuP+5LUscUduV2OMx6LRJV84leXcEcgOVKAw5zp4Qvi2MX2HLwaxQxzgZykYSNqx5 EWDM9/sKlKIaDGdZuxRvdyCP/2LnrOG2nqHXtyPoXyj/26bw06daSQE/RSqNjX6gccDQ 4dy37B7nTJfTfAFNn2oZ6lD1rA9Q4/1bsp5t9vsJlYlFGJu1JPjc5ilfkvZ6XnGk8i87 wTTBFKWSytyXw7k8DqHirI+doUICP5QHNtvyxANv3AIO4rXXWtsGZxOSAgf+RjjQgXa2 HDhY0z1+rUxQ8ExTPVjP/QbhCv/lsl8hJRCiV/ZHl4kSXXUyjffkmqzUxQWr6rJgadXG 1/xQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <50e6891c$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 03:01:41 +1100 Subject: Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1357401711 news.xs4all.nl 6854 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52255 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:36191 On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > On 4 January 2013 15:53, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2013-01-04, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:25:51 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: >>> >>> * But frankly, you should avoid eval, and write your own mini-integer >>> arithmetic evaluator which avoids even the most remote possibility >>> of exploit. >> >> That's obviously the "right" thing to do. I suppose I should figure >> out how to use the ast module. > > Someone has already created a module that does this called numexpr. Is > there some reason why you don't want to use that? > >>>> import numexpr >>>> numexpr.evaluate('2+4*5') > array(22, dtype=int32) >>>> numexpr.evaluate('2+a*5', {'a':4}) > array(22L) Is that from PyPI? It's not in my Python 3.3 installation. Obvious reason not to use it: Unaware of it. :) ChrisA