Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76100
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <cameron@cskk.homeip.net> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'handler': 0.05; 'tries': 0.07; 'runs': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; "wouldn't": 0.14; '**kwargs)': 0.16; '**kwargs):': 0.16; '__future__': 0.16; 'c-level': 0.16; 'from:addr:cs': 0.16; 'from:addr:zip.com.au': 0.16; 'from:name:cameron simpson': 0.16; 'handler.': 0.16; 'message-id:@cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'ought': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'received:211.29': 0.16; 'received:211.29.132': 0.16; 'received:cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:optusnet.com.au': 0.16; 'received:syd.optusnet.com.au': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'later': 0.20; 'import': 0.22; 'putting': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'issue,': 0.24; 'cheers,': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'host': 0.29; 'work.': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'context.': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'ordinary': 0.31; 'work:': 0.31; 'older': 0.33; 'plain': 0.33; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:com.au': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'level': 0.37; 'received:211': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'signal': 0.60; 'course': 0.61; 'content-disposition:inline': 0.62; '(that': 0.65; 'close': 0.67; 'believe': 0.68; 'statement,': 0.68; 'prone': 0.91; 'imagine': 0.93 |
| Date | Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:15:20 +1000 |
| From | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: Is print thread safe? |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| In-Reply-To | <87k36ee1xo.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
| References | <87k36ee1xo.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| X-Optus-CM-Score | 0 |
| X-Optus-CM-Analysis | v=2.1 cv=fvDlOjIf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=YuQlxtEQCowy2cfE5kc7TA==:117 a=YuQlxtEQCowy2cfE5kc7TA==:17 a=ZtCCktOnAAAA:8 a=PO7r1zJSAAAA:8 a=LcaDllckn3IA:10 a=PzczSypyshMA:10 a=gyjTKktfeJ0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=vrnE16BAAAAA:8 a=KaybevnVAAAA:8 a=kZ7UWmmPAAAA:8 a=6qxQwj5dJAuZdegWAz4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=X5q3X6-Q1Y0A:10 a=pyH5b1fOeEsA:10 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12879.1407824124.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 34 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1407824124 news.xs4all.nl 2883 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49133 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:76100 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12Aug2014 08:01, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote:
>Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>:
>> Personally, I believe that print ought to do its own locking. And
>> print is a statement, although in this case there's no need to support
>> anything older than 2.6, so something like this ought to work:
>>
>> from __future__ import print_function
>>
>> _print = print
>> _rlock = threading.RLock()
>> def print(*args, **kwargs):
>> with _rlock:
>> _print(*args, **kwargs)
>
>Could this cause a deadlock if print were used in signal handlers?
At the C level one tries to do as little as possible in q signal handler.
Typically setting a flag or putting something on a queue for later work.
In Python that may be a much smaller issue, since I imagine the handler runs in
the ordinary course of interpretation, outside the C-level handler context.
I personally wouldn't care if this might deadlock in a handler (lots of things
might; avoid as many things as possible). Also, the code above uses an RLock;
less prone to deadlock than a plain mutex Lock.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
A host is a host from coast to coast
& no one will talk to a host that's close
Unless the host (that isn't close)
is busy, hung or dead
- David Lesher, wb8foz@skybridge.scl.cwru.edu
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is print thread safe? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-11 07:44 +0000
Re: Is print thread safe? INADA Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com> - 2014-08-11 19:19 +0900
Re: Is print thread safe? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-12 02:07 +1000
Re: Is print thread safe? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-08-12 07:53 +1000
Re: Is print thread safe? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-12 09:56 +1000
Re: Is print thread safe? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 10:14 +1000
Re: Is print thread safe? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-12 08:01 +0300
Re: Is print thread safe? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-08-12 16:15 +1000
Re: Is print thread safe? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2014-08-12 14:31 +1000
Re: Is print thread safe? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-12 23:53 +1000
csiph-web