Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'value,': 0.04; 'none,': 0.05; 'false,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'collections': 0.09; 'from:addr:web.de': 0.09; 'boolean': 0.16; 'defaultdict': 0.16; 'received:80.91': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229': 0.16; 'received:dip.t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'received:gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:list': 0.16; 'received:t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'syntax.': 0.16; 'tags.': 0.16; 'items.': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.19; "who's": 0.20; 'import': 0.20; '"",': 0.21; 'keys': 0.21; 'trouble': 0.24; 'run': 0.25; 'figure': 0.26; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'this.': 0.27; 'values': 0.28; 'wondering': 0.28; 'context,': 0.28; 'dictionary': 0.28; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.29; 'could': 0.32; 'lists': 0.33; 'false': 0.34; 'version': 0.34; 'two': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'things': 0.35; 'list': 0.35; 'should': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.36; 'item': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'means': 0.38; 'skip:i 20': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; '...': 0.40; 'received:net': 0.60; 'evaluate': 0.62; 'first': 0.62; 'below.': 0.68; 'subject:this': 0.84; 'played': 0.84; 'subject:better': 0.84; 'subject:there': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:24:46 +0200 Organization: None References: <52664090-0833-4ec2-af8b-326737dd67d1@w5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5084a70c.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: KNode/4.7.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 34 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1333466694 news.xs4all.nl 6878 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56400 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:22610 python wrote: > I played around with a few things and this works but was wondering if > there was a better way to do this. > My first thought was list comprehension but could not get a figure out > the syntax. > > tag23gr is a list of lists each with two items. > g23tag is an empty dictionary when I run the for loop below. > When is is complete each key is a graphic name who's values are a list > of tags. > > for item in tag23gr: > ... value, key = tuple(item) > ... if(g23tag.get(key)): That should be if key in g23tag: Your version means trouble for keys that evaluate to False in a boolean context, e. g. 0, False, None, "", (),... > ... g23tag[key].append(value) > ... else: > ... g23tag[key] = [value] from collections import defaultdict g23tag = defaultdict(list) for value, key in tag23gr: g23tag[key].append(value)