Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'context': 0.07; 'skip:` 10': 0.07; 'arguments': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:lock': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'specify': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'to?': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'usually': 0.31; 'but': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'manager': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'received:173': 0.61; "'with'": 0.84; 'protocol,': 0.84 Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 06:25:45 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Python Subject: Re: Specifying `blocking` and `timeout` when acquiring lock as a context manager References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1407504346 news.xs4all.nl 2942 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44259 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:75881 On 08/08/2014 04:51 AM, cool-RR wrote: > > If I want to acquire a `threading.Lock` using the context manager protocol, > is it possible to specify the `blocking` and `timeout` arguments that > `acquire` would usually take? Not that I know of, but why would you want to? There's no built-in 'if' with a 'with' block -- how would your code know whether it ran or not? -- ~Ethan~