Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #75801
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <usethisid2014@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.048 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'nested': 0.07; 'thats': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; "'from": 0.16; '100;': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'loop.': 0.16; 'looping': 0.16; 'loops': 0.16; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'normally': 0.19; 'example': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'aug': 0.22; '>': 0.26; 'compare': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'array': 0.29; 'compared': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.33; 'operations': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'right?': 0.36; 'surely': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'expected': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'new': 0.61; 'further': 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; 'dear': 0.65; 'yes': 0.68; '100': 0.79; 'otten': 0.84; 'picture.': 0.84; 'subject:space': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=y4vEROqd8yaUzLBqDxLcstFKyPyZZ8g1MNvPRvvZi/M=; b=sL4dWYQX+9ggEgYz3UmZfH8DQK24QS5X0mMmfSOxDM7wZgwZf9XCGF0BBBvva+kB83 zys3/0gg2Wl2EcK3XNRDD+JJ6gcFpMDekDnUHNk9o9mPIwjMsvYSDovMI8TpriCiYAnF AeAhkioIBlwhjh3QetTphrytIlpxk3RnJDoppFcrLAsLrwz3GtpToinx1pk0SNhOotOs 3qEZ7DryT8u38ht525XgCEyzyTHLpPWaR5D/XIM8F1sgBIHJO5zzyuP3EyLvVq3BeHXn aNb5J0p+fKJajSfCe2r+Ku7klOGRCjwv1sgqsWTousHaKov4RzjYcN+fOeR0XD7UbBtH jH8g== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.180.20.40 with SMTP id k8mr51370568wie.38.1407331645948; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 06:27:25 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <lrt7m9$s3l$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| References | <lrrdfc$7q7$1@dont-email.me> <53E1E180.6070308@gmail.com> <CAKiaUYz40HJ9bGpv8BpmE7ptK5gzMJJkS0c9BsBXsGiZWbZifg@mail.gmail.com> <lrt7m9$s3l$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Date | Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:57:25 +0530 |
| Subject | Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? |
| From | Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53d57afd6885e04fff5ee30 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12702.1407331653.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 103 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1407331653 news.xs4all.nl 2932 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56507 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:75801 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Dear Peter thanks . But thats what I was trying to say just taking them to zero by f[:,:,:] = 0.0 or using np.zeros is surely going to give me a time gain... but my example of using the itertools.product() and doing f[x] =0.0 is just to compare the looping timing with the traditional nested loops and not to distract us to the operation done inside the loop. right? On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: > Gayathri J wrote: > > > Dear Peter > > > > Yes the f[t] or f[:,:,:] might give a marginal increase, > > The speedup compared itertools.product() is significant: > > $ python -m timeit -s 'from itertools import product; from numpy.random > import rand; N = 100; a = rand(N, N, N); r = range(N)' 'for x in product(r, > repeat=3): a[x] = 0.0' > 10 loops, best of 3: 290 msec per loop > > $ python -m timeit -s 'from itertools import product; from numpy.random > import rand; N = 100; a = rand(N, N, N); r = range(N)' 'a[:,:,:] = 0.0' > 100 loops, best of 3: 3.58 msec per loop > > But normally you'd just make a new array with numpy.zeros(). > > > but then i need > > to do further operations using the indices, in which case this wouldnt > > help > > Which is expected and also the crux of such micro-benchmarks. They distract > from big picture. > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:06 +0000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-05 22:48 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:57 +0000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 11:04 +0530
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 16:25 +1000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-08-06 08:33 +0100
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-06 06:39 -0500
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Wojciech Giel <wojtekgiel@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 09:04 +0100
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 17:43 +0530
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 14:39 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 18:57 +0530
csiph-web