Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #75801
| References | <lrrdfc$7q7$1@dont-email.me> <53E1E180.6070308@gmail.com> <CAKiaUYz40HJ9bGpv8BpmE7ptK5gzMJJkS0c9BsBXsGiZWbZifg@mail.gmail.com> <lrt7m9$s3l$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-06 18:57 +0530 |
| Subject | Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? |
| From | Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12702.1407331653.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Dear Peter thanks . But thats what I was trying to say just taking them to zero by f[:,:,:] = 0.0 or using np.zeros is surely going to give me a time gain... but my example of using the itertools.product() and doing f[x] =0.0 is just to compare the looping timing with the traditional nested loops and not to distract us to the operation done inside the loop. right? On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: > Gayathri J wrote: > > > Dear Peter > > > > Yes the f[t] or f[:,:,:] might give a marginal increase, > > The speedup compared itertools.product() is significant: > > $ python -m timeit -s 'from itertools import product; from numpy.random > import rand; N = 100; a = rand(N, N, N); r = range(N)' 'for x in product(r, > repeat=3): a[x] = 0.0' > 10 loops, best of 3: 290 msec per loop > > $ python -m timeit -s 'from itertools import product; from numpy.random > import rand; N = 100; a = rand(N, N, N); r = range(N)' 'a[:,:,:] = 0.0' > 100 loops, best of 3: 3.58 msec per loop > > But normally you'd just make a new array with numpy.zeros(). > > > but then i need > > to do further operations using the indices, in which case this wouldnt > > help > > Which is expected and also the crux of such micro-benchmarks. They distract > from big picture. > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:06 +0000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-05 22:48 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:57 +0000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 11:04 +0530
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 16:25 +1000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-08-06 08:33 +0100
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-06 06:39 -0500
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Wojciech Giel <wojtekgiel@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 09:04 +0100
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 17:43 +0530
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 14:39 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 18:57 +0530
csiph-web