Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #75801

Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space?

References <lrrdfc$7q7$1@dont-email.me> <53E1E180.6070308@gmail.com> <CAKiaUYz40HJ9bGpv8BpmE7ptK5gzMJJkS0c9BsBXsGiZWbZifg@mail.gmail.com> <lrt7m9$s3l$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date 2014-08-06 18:57 +0530
Subject Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space?
From Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.12702.1407331653.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Dear Peter

thanks . But thats what I was trying to say

just taking them to zero by f[:,:,:] = 0.0 or using np.zeros is surely
going to give me a time gain...
but my example of using the itertools.product() and doing f[x] =0.0 is just
to compare the looping timing with the traditional nested loops and not to
distract us to the operation done inside the loop.

right?


On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:

> Gayathri J wrote:
>
> > Dear Peter
> >
> > Yes the f[t] or f[:,:,:] might give  a marginal increase,
>
> The speedup compared itertools.product() is significant:
>
> $ python -m timeit -s 'from itertools import product; from numpy.random
> import rand; N = 100; a = rand(N, N, N); r = range(N)' 'for x in product(r,
> repeat=3): a[x] = 0.0'
> 10 loops, best of 3: 290 msec per loop
>
> $ python -m timeit -s 'from itertools import product; from numpy.random
> import rand; N = 100; a = rand(N, N, N); r = range(N)' 'a[:,:,:] = 0.0'
> 100 loops, best of 3: 3.58 msec per loop
>
> But normally you'd just make a new array with numpy.zeros().
>
> > but then i need
> > to do further operations  using the indices, in which case this wouldnt
> > help
>
> Which is expected and also the crux of such micro-benchmarks. They distract
> from big picture.
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:06 +0000
  Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-05 22:48 +0200
  Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:57 +0000
    Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 11:04 +0530
    Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 16:25 +1000
    Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-08-06 08:33 +0100
    Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 09:39 +0200
    Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-06 06:39 -0500
  Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Wojciech Giel <wojtekgiel@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 09:04 +0100
  Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 17:43 +0530
  Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 14:39 +0200
  Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 18:57 +0530

csiph-web