Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #75783
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? |
| Date | 2014-08-06 08:33 +0100 |
| References | <lrrdfc$7q7$1@dont-email.me> <lrrggd$6hk$1@dont-email.me> <CAKiaUYzvFztyJt+eBp50VSiLmjb8Gg=+Z8YBjud_0K8dDPEYkA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12690.1407310415.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06/08/2014 06:34, Gayathri J wrote: > Dear Peter > > Below is the code I tried to check if itertools.product() was faster > than normal nested loops... > > they arent! arent they supposed to be...or am i making a mistake? any idea? > * > * > *############################################################ > * > *# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- > * > *import numpy as np* > *import time* > *from itertools import product,repeat* > *def main():* > * # N - size of grid* > * # nvel - number of velocities* > * # times - number of times to run the functions* > * N=256* > * times=3* > * f=np.random.rand(N,N,N)* > ** > * # using loops* > * print "normal nested loop"* > * python_dot_loop1(f,times,N)* > * > * > * print "nested loop using itertools.product()"* > * python_dot_loop2(f,times,N)* > * > * > *def python_dot_loop1(f,times,N):* > * for t in range(times):* > * t1=time.time()* > * for i in range(N):* > * for j in range(N):* > * for k in range(N):* > * f[i,j,k] = 0.0* > * print "python dot loop " + str(time.time()-t1)* > ** > *def python_dot_loop2(f,times,N):* > * rangeN=range(N)* > * for t in range(times):* > * t1=time.time()* > * for i,j,k in product(rangeN,repeat=3):* > * f[i,j,k]=0.0* > * print "python dot loop " + str(time.time()-t1)* > * > * > * > * > *if __name__=='__main__':* > * main()* > *############################################################* > > Who cares, well not I for one? Give me slower but accurate code over faster but inaccurate code any day of the week? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:06 +0000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-05 22:48 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2014-08-05 20:57 +0000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 11:04 +0530
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 16:25 +1000
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-08-06 08:33 +0100
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 09:39 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-06 06:39 -0500
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Wojciech Giel <wojtekgiel@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 09:04 +0100
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 17:43 +0530
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-08-06 14:39 +0200
Re: Pythonic way to iterate through multidimensional space? Gayathri J <usethisid2014@gmail.com> - 2014-08-06 18:57 +0530
csiph-web