Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Dennis Lee Bieber Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Promoting Python Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:04:25 -0400 Organization: IISS Elusive Unicorn Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de E/gvECs01HJ0AOsfhXp6jQdheFuzcdW9zBb1x10RnHsg== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'seemed': 0.07; 'differing': 0.09; 'message-id:@4ax.com': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'wed,': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'basic.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'url:home': 0.18; "haven't": 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'time:': 0.27; 'fork': 0.29; 'minimal': 0.30; 'probably': 0.31; 'though.': 0.33; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'believe': 0.66; 'money': 0.71; '250': 0.76; '(is': 0.84; '>with': 0.84; 'dennis': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-108-68-178-90.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 X-No-Archive: YES X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:106568 On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:06:10 +0100, BartC declaimed the following: >Last time I looked, there seemed to be around 250 dialects of Basic, and >with wildly differing implementations from pure interpreters to full >compilers, from GWBASIC to .NET. (Is there even an official standard?) > If one trusts Wikipedia -- there are two: "minimal BASIC" and "full BASIC"... I don't intend to fork over the money to get a copy though. Though they haven't been updated in some time: minimal is 1978, and full is 1987. Believe they are based on K&K/Dartmouth BASIC. Probably require line numbers and have no graphics. -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/