Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.026 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'that?': 0.05; 'suppose': 0.07; 'ast': 0.09; '"right"': 0.16; 'to:name:python list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'obviously': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'import': 0.21; 'do.': 0.21; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'possibility': 0.27; 'module.': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'arithmetic': 0.29; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'figure': 0.30; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'remote': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'created': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'most': 0.61; '2013': 0.84; 'oscar': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cEKK23jnu8WnBIA2ayy2H2f5yMrNnXdsA+UeMN7NBQY=; b=ZcKBpBvqLxCn6gtPga+6rU9zHpCcF6wj1DzRtnrsVjoo06TmGHKI+xT4nycxPGSIdw b4hXO0phQrG6nukUkfEDrDtPfSv6HTTup3IcOjfZAj6XvPLI4sbSiTg3TrQDcCbn4umk g9qUSPYu3fasr6ZRg8khOcDaQquT3KTcAyUrpVAjlqaCK7v2tSJPJbkyncGOIgyokeyU scSsY9I+qhgZzSAMb/omj5vejPBycUPVdPThHDEcCTJp2E0vVf/cSb1eAHZOcD80wY7s hzrmAQt9LZu3aJhngS5Rnb5wNPWIl7fzRNhWugl+DAQqxD2iuAghwYmnpsDmgadhy00g JPvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <50e6891c$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:56:31 +0000 Subject: Re: Yet another attempt at a safe eval() call From: Oscar Benjamin To: Python List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1357401393 news.xs4all.nl 6969 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45948 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:36188 On 4 January 2013 15:53, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2013-01-04, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:25:51 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: >> >> * But frankly, you should avoid eval, and write your own mini-integer >> arithmetic evaluator which avoids even the most remote possibility >> of exploit. > > That's obviously the "right" thing to do. I suppose I should figure > out how to use the ast module. Someone has already created a module that does this called numexpr. Is there some reason why you don't want to use that? >>> import numexpr >>> numexpr.evaluate('2+4*5') array(22, dtype=int32) >>> numexpr.evaluate('2+a*5', {'a':4}) array(22L) Oscar