Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #75444
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.003 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:error': 0.03; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'uses.': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'behavior:': 0.16; 'expressions,': 0.16; 'key/datum': 0.16; 'partly': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'runtime.': 0.16; 'subject:key': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'throw': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'slightly': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'error': 0.23; '"you': 0.24; '31,': 0.24; 'case.': 0.24; 'documented': 0.24; 'simpler': 0.24; 'skip:{ 20': 0.24; 'specify': 0.24; 'initial': 0.24; 'define': 0.26; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'updating': 0.26; 'certain': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'wondering': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'generally': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'keys': 0.31; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'returning': 0.36; 'expected': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'changed': 0.39; 'course': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'design,': 0.64; '8bit%:21': 0.69; 'jul': 0.74; 'dict()': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6h35jjU2THHYzTs9OM3gXoo63OYWBVJrrnTjd5bWqPE=; b=AyoWIOhZ/AXlfiE2FvS0YSBabiJg77Ek5tY7vb8HzcenxfgzRE3VToWmH3hV845lCa KMjTRWN2yD9bh3aGJXKeE/IyawLCahB4iJYE1va1z5Erj2Oia4bCTfvsFsYQnZu+i7ex u0oyG/C0v2eA5pzSBqHj+70BY3ItOKYbTXwO8yJup7FQ+jfYBXTqdtc8xAeud7ZVL23l RPBKcRf1pcwFPSOF0lRPO7awGzy2pjZ6HOvzNqW7nUcMUH5LYGb63sWiS/iP4Ps0PbZU nz/DzJ8rHxDvrHjUPyv676HD3dSbI/JLD3OpAmWQrqEMdSSMq3XkPFrvVVOLLwO6NJ1o gpXg== |
| X-Received | by 10.68.65.101 with SMTP id w5mr881763pbs.5.1406841455339; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:17:35 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <lre4p7$ldu$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| References | <CAFBK5a-hjukHaHOim4tL_RerXiHsFP03eaQoN42yGfeCJ9NZPg@mail.gmail.com> <lre4p7$ldu$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:16:55 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Dict when defining not returning multi value key error |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12492.1406841464.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 28 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1406841464 news.xs4all.nl 2932 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50669 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:75444 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> On 7/31/2014 7:24 AM, Dilu Sasidharan wrote:
>
>> I am wondering why the dictionary in python not returning multi value
>> key error when i define something like
>>
>> p = {'k':"value0",'k':"value1"}
>
>
> This is documented behavior: "you can specify the same key multiple times in
> the key/datum list, and the final dictionary’s value for that key will be
> the last one given." I am not sure whether this is an accident of the
> initial design, never changed since, or intended for certain uses. It may
> partly be because this choice is slightly simpler or, since keys are
> expressions, not constants, that the check can only come at runtime.
I don't know either, but I think that it's generally expected that the
above would be equivalent to:
p = dict()
p['k'] = "value0"
p['k'] = "value1"
which of course will not throw an error since you're just updating the
value in that case.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Dict when defining not returning multi value key error Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-07-31 15:16 -0600
csiph-web