Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.042 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'method.': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'accessible,': 0.16; 'subject:PYTHON': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'second': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'separate': 0.27; 'this.': 0.29; 'ease': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'being': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'far': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'called': 0.39; 'comparable': 0.84; 'subject:WEB': 0.84; 'subject:running': 0.84; 'realistic': 0.93 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:12:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.41.222.55; posting-account=aw7wEQoAAACnaP8vftI9MyiC9NfXNJyr References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 70.41.222.55 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: HTML - WEB FORM running PYTHON SCRIPT From: llanitedave To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1356328425 news.xs4all.nl 6870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35241 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:35442 I'll second this. Javascript is pretty comparable to Python in ease of lea= rning, so that should be no obstacle. As for keeping the code from being a= ccessible, you can put the javascript in a separate file that's called from= the guest's web page, but that's far from a foolproof method. If you want= the guest browser to do the calculation, there's no realistic way to keep = the calculation code off of it.