Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.061 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; '(even': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'already.': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'gui': 0.12; 'builder.': 0.16; 'porting': 0.16; 'replaced.': 0.16; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'excel': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'could': 0.34; 'problem.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'done': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'problems': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; 'happen': 0.63; 'offering': 0.63; 'world': 0.66; 'continuous': 0.68; 'paper': 0.75; 'improvement,': 0.84; 'received:192.168.0.5': 0.84 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:28:32 +0200 From: Dietmar Schwertberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: .Net Like Gui Builder for Python? References: <53D2CAD8.1040306@schwertberger.de> <757bd14c-3742-4674-b305-b0cfe5a58b90@gmail.com> <53D37F70.4080800@schwertberger.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1406374123 news.xs4all.nl 2872 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36155 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:75245 Am 26.07.2014 12:25, schrieb Chris Angelico: > The only difference is that you outgrow paper sooner than VB, which > means porting is done on a much smaller "code"-base and is less of a > problem. Most Excel or VB based tools are never replaced. They are the replacement and final implementation of the paper solution already. The world would be a better one if Python was chosen instead of Excel for implementation, offering a continuous path for improvement, but that won't happen without an easy-to-use GUI builder. (Even though many problems could be addressed without a GUI, it's still what people want.) Regards, Dietmar