Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Ethan Furman Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Moderation and slight change of (de facto) policy Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 16:29:04 -0700 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <5713C08F.3010207@timgolden.me.uk> <57140947.3050902@gmail.com> <57141C40.8060007@stoneleaf.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 9VR0WedN5EiC90RoSK24Zw0kwWsdF59fnvzyjzBM55Uw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.015 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'list?': 0.07; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'moderation,': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'saying.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'purposes': 0.20; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'option': 0.31; 'subject:) ': 0.32; 'subject:change': 0.33; 'list': 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'lines': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'does': 0.39; 'along': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'news': 0.68; 'emails,': 0.72; '*really*': 0.84 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: <57140947.3050902@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <57141C40.8060007@stoneleaf.us> X-Mailman-Original-References: <5713C08F.3010207@timgolden.me.uk> <57140947.3050902@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:107204 On 04/17/2016 03:08 PM, Matt Ruffalo wrote: > That seems like a reasonable approach, though I think there *really* > needs to be an option along the lines of "subscribed to the list for the > purposes of moderation, but not receiving list messages via email". I don't understand what you are saying. If you are not receiving emails, how are you reading the list? A news reader? If you are subscribed for moderation, how does that help with the lag time when you do post? -- ~Ethan~