Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!217.188.199.168.MISMATCH!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'output': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'sys': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'inputs': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject: ?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'options.': 0.19; 'typing': 0.19; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'subject:/': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'wondering': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'besides': 0.30; 'skip:( 20': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'fast.': 0.31; 'option': 0.32; 'open': 0.33; 'limitation': 0.33; 'device': 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'disk': 0.36; 'doubt': 0.36; 'thank': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'solve': 0.60; 'competitive': 0.61; 'between': 0.67; 'rendering': 0.68; 'received:pacbell.net': 0.84; 'responses': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: emile Subject: Re: Fastest I/O on Python ? Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:18:06 -0700 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-69-226-129-65.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1406045913 news.xs4all.nl 2841 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46170 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:75003 On 07/22/2014 09:06 AM, Orochi wrote: > Is there in any other input/output faster than ("raw_input","input" / "print") The limitation is with the device -- either the human typing in responses or the output device rendering the output. If you have the option to read/write to disk that'd open up additional options. Otherwise I'm not sure there's much to be gained. Emile > As I am trying to solve competitive Programs on codechef.com using python i was wondering if there is any other way to print and scan the inputs fast. > > > I have seen other people codes and there are using sys library(stdin and stdout) for I/O. > > So I was thinking is there any other way to take input/output besides using 'sys library'. > > And also I had doubt about what is the difference between (raw_input,input/print) and (stdin/stdout) > > Thank You..... >