Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.057 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:IDLE': 0.04; 'anyway.': 0.05; 'pop': 0.05; '21,': 0.07; 'window?': 0.09; 'windows,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'windows': 0.15; '"file': 0.16; '"hide': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'guessing': 0.16; 'reproduce': 0.16; 'sane': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'seems': 0.21; 'command': 0.22; 'appears': 0.22; 'issue.': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'logical': 0.24; 'manager.': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'on,': 0.29; 'subject:) ': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'dialog': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'open': 0.33; 'linux': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'johnson': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'idle': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'application': 0.37; 'step': 0.37; 'implement': 0.38; 'manager': 0.38; 'depends': 0.38; 'window': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'tell': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'choose': 0.64; 'subject:more': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'between': 0.67; 'useful.': 0.68; 'manner': 0.72; 'us,': 0.73; 'jul': 0.74; 'repeat': 0.74; 'eyes': 0.78; 'extras': 0.84; 'intentions': 0.84; 'maximize': 0.84; 'maximized': 0.84; 'taskbar': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; 'reducing': 0.93; 'rick': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=hvHwDfWOfmWdfpSxWy5PgGdUrnyr0tuUn4kW+O6SMl4=; b=dRENOm6mnN1qf8XsQjDUa41V1eQHOm9Zm6ZiUNdgLXpRKVtPAemoDC79xtydQyqrkc POqWs0orUUaZWn6BaTPWw1gScVrQrjLMT8OIg//+IOdOhR5nWQLhtClGF8mjf+e2YJH5 NHz9LfAiN8Hn80VySj8N89JGARMuJGNqA6loYuv6L3abhIVw2+S/CXn6P2RqK65Pqb1q xDlb1VT8lKzQqfV4pJ6TSJh+xQ9gMFgOt+j2Vur/S7sViQ+aIb7Nq0KNizlMb3HCYBRU Mw71NoEjQdDkmY5UZZSXkz1Nt7iQwuzapkb14mrq4HcvVvEQK9kM9foo1q635hJ/EhSZ xvAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.26.10 with SMTP id rk10mr26118278vcb.0.1405910324445; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 19:38:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4882fd4d-b772-4ebb-8aaa-0c20be6051b6@googlegroups.com> References: <232acf45-096d-466a-aa75-06d8c378b128@googlegroups.com> <53cc376e$0$2898$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <53926733-5e65-482f-96bc-0171c6a93d59@googlegroups.com> <4882fd4d-b772-4ebb-8aaa-0c20be6051b6@googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:38:44 +1000 Subject: Re: PyWart(2.7.8) IDLE is more buggy than "Joe's apartment"! From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 47 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1405910327 news.xs4all.nl 2883 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50731 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:74896 On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Rick Johnson wrote: > STEPS TO REPRODUCE BUG 1: "Attack of the clones!" > > 1. Open the IDLE application > 2. Maximize the window that appears > 3. Go to the "File Menu" and choose the "Open" command > > Now repeat step 3 at least one more time, but feel free to > keep opening new dialogs until your fingers bleed and/or > eyes pop out. > > Okay, now tell us, in what manner can an "interface bug" > like this be "beneficial"? You call it a bug because you can't think of any way it could be beneficial. That's the wrong way of looking at it. Something isn't a bug because you find it annoying; it's a bug because it fails to implement the programmer's intentions and/or the docs/specification. Opening multiple dialogs is *often* useful. The extras don't conflict, and you can open multiple files, so why should it be prevented? > STEPS TO REPRODUCE BUG 2: "Hide and go seek!" > > 1. Open the IDLE application > 2. Maximize the window that appears > 3. Go to the "File Menu" and choose the "Open" command > 4. Without disturbing the dialog, minimize the main window > 5. Using the taskbar icon, maximize the window > > Where is the dialog? How will you retrieve it *WITHOUT* > reducing the size of the window? And even if you are smart > enough to "intuit" what happened to the dialog, and how to > retrieve it, how will a noobie "intuit" such a disappearing > act? And how in the hell can this be beneficial? I'm not sure what platform you're on, and this depends a lot on your window manager. I'm guessing you may be on Windows, as Linux people are more likely to be aware of what DE/WM they use, so I tried it out on Windows. The file dialog appears in the alt-tab list, which seems perfectly sane and sensible, and in fact alt-tab is the most logical way to move between maximized windows anyway. This is not an Idle bug at all. It's a window manager issue. ChrisA