Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
From: Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com>
To: <marduk@letterboxes.org>, <python-list@python.org>
Subject: RE: Fastest web framework
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:17:19 +0300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <1348515720.16099.4.camel@stretch>
References: <DUB117-W80EE2285B5E415AA14B5B9919F0@phx.gbl>, <1348515720.16099.4.camel@stretch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.1208.1348517907.27098.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 51
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:29925


Try to see 'Hello World' benchmark as an answer to the question how effecti=
ve is the framework inside...

If computer X boots faster than Y=2C it means it is more effective in this =
particular area.

If a sportsman runs a distance 1 second faster than other=2C he got a medal=
 (it is not quite adequate to say if I load=A0sportsman=A0with 50 kilo bag =
he will not run that fast... just try split the concerns).

Thanks.

Andriy


----------------------------------------
> Subject: Re: Fastest web framework
> From: marduk@letterboxes.org
> To: python-list@python.org
> Date: Mon=2C 24 Sep 2012 15:42:00 -0400
>
> On Sun=2C 2012-09-23 at 12:19 +0300=2C Andriy Kornatskyy wrote:
> > I have run recently a benchmark of a trivial 'hello world' application =
for various python web frameworks (bottle=2C django=2C flask=2C pyramid=2C =
web.py=2C wheezy.web) hosted in uWSGI/cpython2.7 and gunicorn/pypy1.9... yo=
u might find it interesting:
> >
> > http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/09/python-fastest-web-framework.html
> >
> > Comments or suggestions are welcome.
> >
>
> The thing I don't like about these benchmarks is.. they tell you which
> framework is best for writing a trivial 'hello world' application. But
> no one writes trivial 'hello world' applications. A
> framework/programming language/software package/what-have-you. Can be
> really fast for trivial stuff=2C but perform much less favorably when
> performing "real-world" tasks. It's kind of the same argument that's
> used when people say X computer boots faster than Y computer. That's
> nice and all=2C but I spend much more of my time *using* my computer than
> *booting* it=2C so it doesn't give me a good picture of how the computers
> perform. This is why most "good" benchmarks run a series various tests
> based on real-world use cases.
>
> -a
>
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
 		 	   		  =