Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Zsolt?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: UserList - which methods needs to be overriden? Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 18:52:59 +0200 Lines: 5 Message-ID: References: <917ca9c4-aef1-6681-ec70-62de8916117d@shopzeus.com> <7cdb398f-b3f2-9a3c-b444-2229f8496e2f@shopzeus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de jhNBoiFQw4t8Nsk2G8oecQSt4PJVS1kCZuMOyPEPes+g== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.125 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.77; '*S*': 0.02; 'subject:which': 0.09; ':-)': 0.12; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'post': 0.31; "i'll": 0.33; 'thanks!': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'progress': 0.38; 'version': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'better.': 0.66; 'subject:needs': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shopzeus.com; s=shopzeus_com; t=1465491179; bh=4AFW5uQA7AZyxDQNOvv5JkGqFoW8jbA7P75isA5vPCw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dGsaT7x8I7y2RmjCEOc94J+nZ6yjdFXgDUanhinFEh3hCBNnQfEACkwq6NjNAKFN+ sIryDLSYzt1Rky366Jca586Bb+NxQduWuDgeINXLDBtJIeb3dztqQRIsHZlaa/+gct ytcCyZ6J9DpMQMvhltxU4RMFG6nTKroCNfSLczYrvzLDCu/Px9L1amAQoU1s5JHoPH ot94VVWcZ1YfWsqiDiYdyve+o2a/SbCvJ7lHfjpLDkajNQsBt8U92GPKlq55U8pLu5 hLyTJnHfuRCoObylUm/Ph2yIqiWHY2AsGfff8OlSZukW4IvA+pdInyuwNlWnIvD7GS XwouWmLtna6kA== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <917ca9c4-aef1-6681-ec70-62de8916117d@shopzeus.com> <7cdb398f-b3f2-9a3c-b444-2229f8496e2f@shopzeus.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:109757 > [Looks like you made progress while I struggled to come up with the > following. I'll post it anyway.] Your version is much better. Thanks! :-)