Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.albasani.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.047 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.01; 'python,': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'javascript,': 0.07; 'perl,': 0.07; 'ruby,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; '"some': 0.16; 'etc...': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'decide': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'team.': 0.31; 'bad.': 0.31; 'worked': 0.33; 'continuing': 0.33; 'johnson': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'whilst': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'project': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'arrange': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'mailing': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'high': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'here': 0.66; 'believe': 0.68; 'date,': 0.68; 'intelligent': 0.74; 'jul': 0.74; 'hand': 0.80; 'directed': 0.83; 'python-dev': 0.84; 'thing,': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92; 'remember,': 0.93; 'rick': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=3qWpvxN2pDDSRLbxc4t+YrgqNi59zKK6H0hRsyoO6gs=; b=iEMgqUfBhMPIoqCxNTUXsKlQtQb0FwPC/+4H/Wos2e0ogHAfNJxnD+f7KP84/KWtZn VGTRDdOt/yk9QtMLpFVbDvMIuOHpgkKUqTujnXMEa5+0M5K6M050XrXX0hr2JhbHO69G ecgRicdIJaM8OFZb6GYoAG3/0N2kN6ix946C3YdhG7RPI1Yk8CrswoTG2znsJR2Tc6Ax dyGW4Q3JtJ2PImQRPs8HAgQDCMppxuCLKUZiKYhaj2c0NjE07flZo+LCkHEGi4lTEvlt qtlz/rt1J+QiOk/WRA+sqzpHCXxYr/oQi4SGvY+qj9QYhBZo6SvZNRuHV/M7WFE/BMjQ UQsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.58.199 with SMTP id t7mr41855388wjq.14.1405567258063; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:20:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <35c7f9e5-e4ab-4673-88f7-d41e5a4be26b@googlegroups.com> References: <57ajo9poljjre4c4ig0n0ss8kph8k78lp0@4ax.com> <5389cb53$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <99b7b2a2-7521-42d7-a5a0-1a35d4d5b922@googlegroups.com> <53C4A454.9010600@gmail.com> <87zjga4j4v.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <53c57bae$0$9505$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87iomy4ciy.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <53c5f6dc$0$9505$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87egxl4zq8.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <35c7f9e5-e4ab-4673-88f7-d41e5a4be26b@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:20:57 +1000 Subject: Re: Python 3 is killing Python From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1405567259 news.xs4all.nl 2832 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59940 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:74603 On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Rick Johnson wrote: > But i think that when the time arrives, the "someone", or > "some entity" will inevitably decide that, whilst Python2.x > was the best high level language available to date, it has > many flaws that cannot be worked around "cleanly", so > instead of continuing on with Python "as-is", we should take > all the good ideas of Python, plus all the good ideas of > Ruby, plus few good ideas in Perl, Javascript, etc... and > create a *whole* new language that will supersede them all. > > BECAUSE REMEMBER, EVOLUTION IS A GOOD THING! Let 'em. If you believe evolution is such a good thing, you're most welcome to arrange it. Personally, I believe that *guided development* is a good thing, and whaddayaknow, that's exactly what we have here from GvR and from the python-dev team. Proper development of a large or small project requires an intelligent person with a hand on the tiller, not randomly undirected additions (or, perhaps not "undirected" so much as "directed by every single whining mailing list post" - which is the same thing, really); someone needs to decide which ideas are good and which are bad. Undirected evolution is destructive. Directed cultivation is constructive. ChrisA