Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: <2014@jmunch.dk> X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.081 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'anders': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'examples': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; 'to:name :python-list@python.org': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "haven't": 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'along': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'received:dk': 0.31; 'point.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'too': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'help,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Return-path:1': 0.60; 'making': 0.63; 'worth': 0.66; 'subject:For': 0.78; 'improvement': 0.84; 'joel': 0.91 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 01:03:15 +0200 From: "Anders J. Munch" <2014@jmunch.dk> Organization: . User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "python-list@python.org" Subject: Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes References: <53BC05FB.4050707@jmunch.dk> <53BD70F4.4000504@stoneleaf.us> <53BDAF90.8010709@jmunch.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1404946997 news.xs4all.nl 2838 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45800 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:74283 Joel Goldstick wrote: > I've been following along here, and it seems you haven't received the answer > you want or need. So far I received exactly the answer I was expecting. 0 examples of NaN!=NaN being beneficial. I wasn't asking for help, I was making a point. Whether that will lead to improvement of Python, well, I'm not too optimistic, but I feel the point was worth making regardless. regards, Anders