Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.040 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'beer': 0.05; 'anders': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'suggest': 0.14; 'effect,': 0.16; 'nan': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.18; 'numerical': 0.19; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'especially': 0.30; 'go.': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'lists': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'everyone': 0.33; "who's": 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'question,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'mailing': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'read': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'received:173': 0.61; 'offer': 0.62; 'here': 0.66; 'believe': 0.68; 'received:69.56': 0.68; 'useful.': 0.68; 'behavior': 0.77; 'subject:For': 0.78; 'ethan': 0.84 Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:21:34 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes References: <53BC05FB.4050707@jmunch.dk> <53BD70F4.4000504@stoneleaf.us> <53BDAF90.8010709@jmunch.dk> In-Reply-To: <53BDAF90.8010709@jmunch.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3304.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 173.12.184.233 X-Exim-ID: 1X50F4-0006WJ-3Y X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:33675 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 3 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3IzMzA0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1404944503 news.xs4all.nl 2863 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32794 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:74282 On 07/09/2014 02:09 PM, Anders J. Munch wrote: > Ethan Furman: >> >> I would suggest you ask for this on the numerical mailing lists instead of here -- and you may not want to offer a >> beer to everyone that has an anecdote for NaN behavior being useful. > > I don't have time to start this discussion over again on another mailing list. Don't anyone on those lists read > python-list also? I believe there are a handful, but I don't know how active they are here. For a straight-up numbers type question, especially about NaN and who's using it to what effect, a numbers or scientific mailing list is really the way to go. -- ~Ethan~