Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.145
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.82; '*S*': 0.11; '16,': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'wednesday,': 0.07; 'parsing': 0.09; 'sanity': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'forth.': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'likewise': 0.16; 'message- id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'shirt': 0.16; 'subject:Java': 0.16; ':-)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'certainly': 0.24; 'academic': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'third': 0.33; 'knowledge': 0.35; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'reply': 0.66; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.67; 'subject': 0.69; 'wish': 0.70; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'crime.': 0.84; 'everywhere.': 0.84; 'fourth': 0.84; 'punishment': 0.84; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'rubbish': 0.84; 'dozen': 0.91; 'rusi': 0.91; 'sorry.': 0.91; '2013': 0.98
X-CM-Score: 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=bKAvfpOZ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=05MOGALpfCEA:10 a=lzHmvMCVCywA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=LRIBY6jzgPQA:10 a=2n2-P_1SU9pGXqZ4efEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
X-AUTH: mrabarnett:2500
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:44:29 +0100
From: MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Python was designed (was Re: Multi-threading in Python vs Java)
References: <mailman.1046.1381617489.18130.python-list@python.org> <l3hg3g$2hd$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.1086.1381800699.18130.python-list@python.org> <fc38c081-e65a-43a8-95fe-de20b3206fba@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1103.1381868788.18130.python-list@python.org> <ccefa048-9a52-423d-8dcb-8436b2d54914@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <ccefa048-9a52-423d-8dcb-8436b2d54914@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: python-list@python.org
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.1168.1382031867.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 22
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1382031867 news.xs4all.nl 15948 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42017
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:56975

On 17/10/2013 18:32, rusi wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:56:27 AM UTC+5:30, zipher wrote:
>> Yes, well clearly we are not "having the same thoughts", yet the
>> purpose of the academic establishment is to pin down such
>> terminology and not have these sloppy understandings everywhere.
>> You dig?
>
> Heh Mark I am really sorry.  I think this is the third or fourth time
> that I say something to which you reply with such egregious rubbish
> -- parsing has something to do with card-punches?!?! Yeah like python
> has something to do with the purple shirt I am wearing -- that a
> dozen others jump at you with a resounding 'Cut the crap!'
>
> Well speaking for myself, I know I speak more wisely sometimes and
> more stupidly at others and I would wish my penalizers to calibrate
> the punishment to the crime.
>
> Likewise here. I certainly 'dig' your passion to clean up the 'sloppy
> understandings everywhere' and would only wish for you the sanity of
> more knowledge of the subject before you begin to hold forth.
>
I learned a new word yesterday: ultracrepidarian. :-)