Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'jeff': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'important,': 0.07; 'problem?': 0.07; 'abstraction': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'jan': 0.11; 'url:blog': 0.11; 'received:80.91': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229': 0.16; 'received:gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:list': 0.16; 'received:verizon.net': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'url:21': 0.16; 'mathematical': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.19; 'least': 0.20; 'written': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "d'aprano": 0.28; 'steven': 0.28; 'url:2008': 0.28; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.29; 'skip:u 20': 0.32; 'impression': 0.32; 'problem': 0.33; 'clear': 0.34; 'am,': 0.34; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.35; 'useful': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'does': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.36; 'architecture': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'anything': 0.38; 'some': 0.39; 'url:12': 0.39; 'url:2004': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'received:net': 0.60; 'between': 0.61; 'solve': 0.62; 'times': 0.62; 'url:10': 0.65; 'url:2005': 0.84; 'url:items': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Python is readable Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:03:41 -0400 References: <4f612b19$0$1379$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <4f750f9f$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4f752a3a$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4f758f43$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <4f758f43$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1333166645 news.xs4all.nl 6897 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41485 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:22406 On 3/30/2012 6:47 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Spolsky has written at least three times about Architecture Astronauts, > and made it abundantly clear that the problem with them is that they > don't solve problems, they invent overarching abstractions that don't do > anything useful or important, and hype them everywhere. > > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2005/10/21.html > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/05/01.html > > Jeff Attwood provides a simple test for the difference between a useful > abstraction and an Architecture Astronaut hyper-abstraction: > > Does it solve a useful problem? > > http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2004/12/it-came-from-planet-architecture.html My strong impression is that theoretical abstract mathematicians also prefer that hi-level abstractions solve some useful-to-mathematicians mathematical problem. -- Terry Jan Reedy