Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.093 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.82; '*S*': 0.01; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'meaningful': 0.09; 'statements': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'cc:name:python list': 0.16; 'subject:Java': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'load': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'this.': 0.32; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'definition': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'science,': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'how': 0.40; 'matter': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'cards': 0.65; 'computers': 0.72; 'cut': 0.74; 'sweeping': 0.84; 'washington': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r/Bt8sY9yzvdenzgV3kc3X76JhsRn5MnsbTv+HE0BXM=; b=QjFSSwzOyC8mjR7t4p3UpzhwOI7qDm2IJehIj60ghwOn0LuOI24sLgzsB2ay5tQxre oI3TlPvKVrQQZekSXOxmeTNOHgNe/zVvublDlAZhD0LfPDAVrwTvTAH6Lt9ta1v+Oa69 ZDo4yHAqAit/g/Twu0S/YoydPYXi4MGa9Itv3RNGNx2cUsvVJGGdvh9rqQH19/vhQ1mw Htp+35X6Nej9y4GEDbkzWBRa1pWIXpEbdMwzjrdr8XmwRSpA7mz7/DFuCro21corPDxg 3t/lGCS7vEkyuWrz3903OGuRs34AJonTi9pbFPd89h42ocLBtWnLzQBOkXqDP3fU1zkP hX1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.113 with SMTP id k17mr29288249wiv.6.1382021392969; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <525F46F5.10802@nedbatchelder.com> References: <525F33BD.80409@nedbatchelder.com> <525F46F5.10802@nedbatchelder.com> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:49:52 -0700 Subject: Re: Python was designed (was Re: Multi-threading in Python vs Java) From: Mark Janssen To: Ned Batchelder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Python List X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1382021401 news.xs4all.nl 15920 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41798 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:56963 > Prior to that [the '70s] you have punch cards where there's no meaningful > definition of "parsing" because there are no tokens. > > I have no idea what you mean by this. [...] > You seem drawn to sweeping statements about the current state and history of > computer science, but then make claims like this about punched cards that > just make no sense. It's like this. No matter how you cut it, you're going to get back to the computers where you load instructions with switches. At that point, I'll be very much looking in anticipation to your binary-digit lexer. -- MarkJ Tacoma, Washington