Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.009 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:error': 0.03; 'none)': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'itself,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'returned,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'compare': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; "i'm": 0.30; 'equality': 0.31; 'there.': 0.32; 'but': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'expected': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'read': 0.60; 'default': 0.69; 'ethan': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'sorry.': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: unorderable error: less ok, equal ok, less-or-equal gives unorderable error! Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:43:48 +0200 Organization: None References: <53B1C013.3070901@stoneleaf.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd96a3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.11.5 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1404218708 news.xs4all.nl 2844 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51241 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:73787 Ethan Furman wrote: > On 06/30/2014 12:34 PM, Peter Otten wrote: >> RainyDay wrote: >>> >>> def __eq__(self, other): >>> return self._loc == getattr(other, "_loc", None) >> >> Note that None is not a good default when _loc is expected to be a tuple: > > In this case None is not being returned, but will be comparid with > self._loc, so RainyDay is good there. RainyDay wrote: > I'm only using None in equality comparison, it's never a default value of > _loc itself, so this should be ok because it'll compare to all other > object types and correctly say they're unequal. Yes, sorry. I read what I expected rather than what was there.