Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.04; 'linear': 0.07; 'python)': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'already.': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'terms).': 0.16; 'jan': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; '(and': 0.22; '(where': 0.23; 'gregory': 0.23; 'replacing': 0.23; '(in': 0.27; 'variables': 0.29; 'ewing': 0.31; 'separately': 0.31; 'trick': 0.31; 'actual': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'fairly': 0.33; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'constant': 0.35; 'usually': 0.36; 'no.': 0.38; 'used': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'could': 0.39; 'header:Mime- Version:1': 0.39; 'solution': 0.40; 'would': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'simple': 0.60; 'presented': 0.63; 'formula': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Coolest Python recipe of all time Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 11:49:01 -0400 References: <69c1813d-1a9a-4686-9768-8ec1910a45f8@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <018ur6da31iv7us9gm4dpgl7tfl0i6snb2@4ax.com> <929lmdF59lU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: <929lmdF59lU1@mid.individual.net> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1304437760 news.xs4all.nl 41117 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:38620 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:4547 On 5/3/2011 2:29 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Terry Reedy wrote: >> The trick is that replacing x with j and evaluating therefore causes >> (in Python) all the coefficients of x (now j) to be added together >> separately from all the constant terms to reduce the linear equation >> to a*x+b (= 0 implied). > > Hmmm... so if we used quaternions, could we solve systems > of linear equations in 3 variables? Yes and no. The use of 1*j merely collected and added together all the multipliers of 'x' (and all the constant terms). That is a fairly trivial matter of constant folding. Systems of linear equations are usually presented in that form already. The actual solution to the simple equation is in the formula x = -a/b (where a and b are the sums). The solution formula for three variables would be far more complex. -- Terry Jan Reedy