Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Ben Finney Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Were is a great place to Share your finished projects? Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:11:20 +1000 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <857fd6uogt.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <85lh16tjg9.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <85h9butagz.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <5785e332$0$21718$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <1bf3954e-f46d-384f-92e2-4a67970cb66c@gmail.com> <5788323c$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <854m7ru2mf.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de LxoVsK52deH+QoOFiGzNdwMZuEqUuD/M4jgO0cUa34PQ== Cancel-Lock: sha1:uik07GymaDq7/qi1Ghf1RDqHz+U= Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.136 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.73; '*S*': 0.00; 'alternatives': 0.09; 'lost.': 0.09; 'protocols.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '2016': 0.16; 'appear.': 0.16; 'attends': 0.16; 'freedom.': 0.16; 'opposite': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'repo': 0.16; 'source"': 0.16; 'subject:projects': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'am,': 0.23; 'proprietary': 0.23; 'discussion': 0.24; 'hosting': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'fri,': 0.27; 'data,': 0.27; 'vendor': 0.27; 'initial': 0.28; 'that.': 0.30; 'somebody': 0.30; 'point': 0.33; 'source': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'lock': 0.33; 'point,': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'open': 0.33; 'quite': 0.35; 'community': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'beginning': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'starting': 0.37; 'no,': 0.38; "won't": 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'enough': 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'software': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'valuable': 0.61; 'reach': 0.61; 'course': 0.62; 'please,': 0.63; 'fall': 0.66; 'decided': 0.66; 'repeat': 0.67; 'day': 0.67; 'choose': 0.68; 'money': 0.71; 'journey': 0.72; 'jul': 0.72; 'subject:your': 0.75; '21st': 0.76; 'hand': 0.82; '_o__)': 0.84; 'century': 0.84; 'dismissed': 0.84; 'fortunately': 0.84; 'python-dev': 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84; 'software".': 0.84; 'understood.': 0.84; 'viable': 0.84; 'watched': 0.91; '\xe2\x80\x9cthe': 0.93; 'mystery': 0.95 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: jigong.madmonks.org X-Public-Key-ID: 0xAC128405 X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405 X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc X-Post-From: Ben Finney User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <854m7ru2mf.fsf@benfinney.id.au> X-Mailman-Original-References: <857fd6uogt.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <85lh16tjg9.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <85h9butagz.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <5785e332$0$21718$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <1bf3954e-f46d-384f-92e2-4a67970cb66c@gmail.com> <5788323c$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:111459 Steven D'Aprano writes: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:13 am, Brendan Abel wrote: > > since they all use software that is closed-source.  At some point, > > paying for software just makes sense. Is it 1998 again already? Or am I expecting too much that people involved in software in the 21st century should not fall for the canard of “why don't you want to pay for software”, because it is *completely irrelevant* to the issue of software freedom. So please, stop repeating that canard. Of course paying for software makes sense. That in no way entails vendor lock-in of valuable community data, and we should not be paying for that. > No, that doesn't follow. The opposite of "open source" is not "paying > for software". You can pay somebody to maintain your open source repo > just as easily as you can pay somebody else to maintain their own > closed source repo. Yes. Likewise, just because you don't hand any money to someone doesn't mean you are free from vendor lock-in and proprietary protocols. One day perhaps we won't need to repeat that for it to be understood. > I watched the discussion on Python-Dev that decided to move to github, > and there were completely viable open source hg alternatives. Although > nobody was quite crass enough to come right out and say it, the > alternatives were all dismissed because they weren't Github, because > "everyone uses github". Fortunately there are a zillion software projects who can still choose a hosting provider that won't lock them in, and good free-software hosting alternatives like Pagure are beginning to appear. Not all is lost. -- \ “The Initial Mystery that attends any journey is: how did the | `\ traveller reach his starting point in the first place?” —Louise | _o__) Bogan, _Journey Around My Room_ | Ben Finney