Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Antoon Pardon Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Regular expressions Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:41:23 +0100 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <662g3blobme52hfoududj27err185v2npm@4ax.com> <56397cfd$0$1601$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de R6IvE1odQ849KX+Vk+86JQu01NFRrvwm66KxXwOGGx1w== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.012 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'mrab': 0.05; 'received:134': 0.05; 'question.': 0.13; 'wednesday': 0.15; '(so,': 0.16; 'received:ac.be': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Regular': 0.16; 'subject:expressions': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; '2015': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'methods.': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'comments': 0.30; 'too.': 0.30; 'received:be': 0.30; 'steven': 0.33; 'could': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'busy': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; "d'aprano:": 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84; 'schreef': 0.84; 'wanted,': 0.84 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUIAGzuOVaGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABehFcBv1SGEwKCDAEBAQEBAYVBAQEEI2YLGAICBSECAg8CRhMIAogqsDeNHINnAQEIAiGBAoVThH6FJ4JOgUMFlkiNI4kLkzZjhAWGJQEBAQ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 In-Reply-To: <56397cfd$0$1601$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:98220 Op 04-11-15 om 04:35 schreef Steven D'Aprano: > On Wednesday 04 November 2015 03:20, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> (So, >> too, are all the comments about using [-1] or string methods. But we >> weren't to know that.) > If MRAB could understand what he wanted, I'm sure most others could have > too. Yes, they were just to busy to try pushing the OP in an other direction, for them to answer the question. -- Antoon Pardon