Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.018 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'method:': 0.09; "skip:' 30": 0.15; 'appreciated!': 0.16; 'exists)': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'key/value': 0.16; 'message- id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'pairs': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; "skip:' 60": 0.16; 'value))': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'trying': 0.21; 'parse': 0.22; 'simpler': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'key,': 0.29; 'received:192.168.1.3': 0.29; 'separated': 0.29; 'received:84': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'skip:{ 10': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'effective': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'header :Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'opinions': 0.72; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'convinced': 0.93 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=BusfMPr5 c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=1EKJ2blYo8kA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=DNHFb_yTqNYA:10 a=odoR4zU4NUw5kV-8jvAA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 X-AUTH: mrabarnett:2500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:50:46 +0000 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Robust regex References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1353358434 news.xs4all.nl 6882 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42459 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33556 On 2012-11-19 20:32, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Trying to robustly parse a string that will have key/value pairs separated > by three pipes, where each additional key/value (if more than one exists) > will be delineated by four more pipes. > > string = 'key_1|||value_1||||key_2|||value_2' > regex = '((?:(?!\|\|\|).)+)(?:\|\|\|)((?:(?!\|\|\|).)+)(?:\|\|\|\|)?' > > I am not convinced this is the most effective or safest, any opinions would > be greatly appreciated! > Do you need to use regex? It would be simpler to use the .split method: for pair in string.split("||||"): key, value = pair.split("|||") print("key is {!r}, value is {!r}".format(key, value))