Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'ignoring': 0.09; 'pep': 0.09; 'subject:()': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'worse': 0.09; 'stored': 0.10; 'language': 0.14; 'cases': 0.15; 'dec': 0.15; '3.2,': 0.16; '>on': 0.16; 'both.': 0.16; 'cares': 0.16; 'obsessed': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'silly': 0.16; 'subject:3.3': 0.16; 'subject:unicode': 0.16; 'unfair': 0.16; 'utterly': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'bytes': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'unicode': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'windows': 0.19; '3.2': 0.22; 'fixing': 0.22; "i've": 0.23; 'least': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; '(which': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'bugs': 0.27; 'skip:> 10': 0.27; 'fixed': 0.28; 'actual': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'character.': 0.29; 'really,': 0.29; 'represented': 0.29; 'thinks': 0.29; 'received:209.85.160.46': 0.32; 'cases,': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'operations': 0.33; 'that,': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'done': 0.34; 'compared': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'enough': 0.36; 'optimization': 0.37; 'uses': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'far': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'build': 0.39; 'space': 0.39; 'think': 0.40; 'content- disposition:inline': 0.60; 'most': 0.61; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'containing': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; '20,': 0.65; 'overall': 0.66; 'him,': 0.66; 'all;': 0.84; 'complaint': 0.84; 'moral': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=f6ETPqP42ALCHeMD96/AQNo8HYksEKXC2t1W6Rx51WE=; b=tZ5sM+Lftk5P1da/yNffXVD7wyurmyQWntCsuGKTb+Ch2zzDBjzhhCSEZRZXEUJPbE VTShtel1j7Lo/uEPEiXiNATUS1mlCVOhOomZhpgmRtlM1FNMzigReeRRQ75dRuuKWLBA 4qWPw5Wmj2m+uCzSLoFzhsHZlHQH4admWQumCka5zcVhxP36K8dA6dXFNxfL6CGgSKBR YfR9/2EnAd3fuv7AERIe0rvX+1mFMYPIR/5HeZQcBbNW1O64MwZvLwVVRMAXwkB3//of F/SY/xI4i/JeCTS27Pd9XBWxK1SH/2JX/Iv04Cmv/rKf15dkjtIi0fArg3AC8NqgYHkc PjaQ== X-Received: by 10.68.235.71 with SMTP id uk7mr25436993pbc.10.1355973147957; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:12:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:12:23 -0800 From: Westley =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDnez?= To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Py 3.3, unicode / upper() References: <2adb4a25-8ea3-441f-b8c0-ee6c87e4b19f@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1355973157 news.xs4all.nl 6908 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39678 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:35178 On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:54:20PM -0500, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 12/19/2012 9:03 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > >> From what I've been able to discern, [jmf's] actual complaint about PEP > >>393 stems from misguided moral concerns. With PEP-393, strings that > >>can be fully represented in Latin-1 can be stored in half the space > >>(ignoring fixed overhead) compared to strings containing at least one > >>non-Latin-1 character. jmf thinks this optimization is unfair to > >>non-English users and immoral; he wants Latin-1 strings to be treated > >>exactly like non-Latin-1 strings (I don't think he actually cares > >>about non-BMP strings at all; if narrow-build Unicode is good enough > >>for him, then it must be good enough for everybody). > > > >Not entirely; most of his complaints are based on performance (speed > >and/or memory) of 3.3 compared to a narrow build of 3.2, using silly > >edge cases to prove how much worse 3.3 is, while utterly ignoring the > >fact that, in those self-same edge cases, 3.2 is buggy. > > And the fact that stringbench.py is overall about as fast with 3.3 > as with 3.2 *on the same Windows 7 machine* (which uses narrow build > in 3.2), and that unicode operations are not far from bytes > operations when the same thing can be done with both. > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy Really, why should we be so obsessed with speed anyways? Isn't improving the language and fixing bugs far more important?