Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'suppose': 0.05; 'press,': 0.07; 'sake': 0.09; 'syntax': 0.11; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.13; 'received:mail-iw0-f174.google.com': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'library': 0.15; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'low-level': 0.16; 'rantingrick': 0.16; 'two).': 0.16; 'pm,': 0.16; 'that?': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'assume': 0.23; "python's": 0.25; '(in': 0.26; 'load': 0.26; 'fri,': 0.28; 'received:209.85.214': 0.28; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'programmers': 0.31; 'cases': 0.32; "i'll": 0.33; 'actually': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'instead': 0.34; 'force': 0.34; 'define': 0.35; 'certain': 0.36; 'operations': 0.36; 'sequence': 0.37; 'some': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'put': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'needed.': 0.40; 'received:209': 0.40; 'give': 0.60; 'maximum': 0.62; 'movement': 0.68; 'favour': 0.73; '11:54': 0.84; 'movement,': 0.84; 'mr.': 0.86 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ErV13Tx1eoT66gi70DGKAFwV8IHp5GR73OsmakDZL8w=; b=siSSBaFPjHVjZO6FwdreRjXuvycz3o2wKRr9pZSh8Wee1uE013veNO+9WC/9hQIXFp 2G1ASqk3DmzYHDhlvsGdnRI8ppEHAft57od5eYh5IfqWsk3hjs0OH7NPziHW+PObG3+Z bHz9aki9+eo5OXWV+EvjWnZL8OgPkB5okjLQQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6560d2cc-531e-4346-a2f6-fddb2635f44f@p14g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> References: <6560d2cc-531e-4346-a2f6-fddb2635f44f@p14g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:02:25 +1000 Subject: Re: Multiplicity and Asininity in Tkinter Event API From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1310738549 news.xs4all.nl 23909 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45235 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9547 On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:54 PM, rantingrick wrote: > Ok Mr. Pedantic. I suppose for unity sake we should use the sequence > name "" instead of . I'll give you that one. > It is very significant; if you call it Click, people will assume it means Press, Release within a certain maximum time and without more than a maximum amount of movement (in some cases 0 movement, others permit a mickey or two). Yes, that's all that's actually needed. But if you force programmers to process the low-level events, you put load on them that they don't need. It's possible to define every program in terms of a handful of operations - do you want to ditch all of Python's rich syntax and library in favour of that? ChrisA