Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'terry': 0.07; 'cases.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'recursion': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.11; 'subject:error': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; '(number': 0.16; 'itself).': 0.16; 'labeled': 0.16; 'multiplied': 0.16; 'nodes': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'tree': 0.20; 'jan': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'calls.': 0.23; 'calculated': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'bit': 0.33; 'using': 0.34; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'actually': 0.34; 'requires': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'put': 0.35; 'else': 0.37; 'case': 0.37; 'faster': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Mime- Version:1': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'double': 0.69; 'million': 0.75; '330': 0.84; 'sum': 0.89 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Terry Reedy Subject: Re: Fibonacci series recursion error Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 22:30:02 -0400 References: <4dbbb7b6$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1304303414 news.xs4all.nl 81479 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:42047 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:4433 On 5/1/2011 7:16 PM, BartC wrote: > Yes, it generates lots of calls. > > About 22000 for fib(20), and 330 million for fib(40). Using the standard double recursion implementation of fib, ncf(n) (number of calls to fib() for fib(n)) requires ncf(n-2) + ncf(n+1) + 1 calls. The +1 is for the call to fib(n) itself). So it grows a bit faster than fib(n). Fib(n) is actually calculated as the sum of fib(n) 1s: 1+1+1....+1 fib(n) times as 1 is the only non-0 base case and there is nothing else added or multiplied in non-base cases. To put it another way, there are fib(n) leaf nodes labeled 1 in the unbalanced tree generated by the recursion. -- Terry Jan Reedy