Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Ben Finney Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Question about math.pi is mutable Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 23:15:32 +1100 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de ZUpvr8Nc7WtMR0YEqhCEKQoyVIi9XsoragAy4Oiteggw== Cancel-Lock: sha1:0TvLnitG0HmyWs2/aH+Elh2JTko= Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.011 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'subject:Question': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'assume': 0.11; 'pity': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'closer': 0.29; 'mind,': 0.29; 'pertinent': 0.29; 'allows': 0.30; 'anyone': 0.32; 'though.': 0.33; 'could': 0.35; 'question,': 0.35; 'too': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'missing': 0.37; 'anything': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; '100%': 0.72; '_o__)': 0.84; "else's": 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84; 'essence': 0.91; 'widespread': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: jigong.madmonks.org X-Public-Key-ID: 0xAC128405 X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405 X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc X-Post-From: Ben Finney User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:98391 Bartc writes: > To my mind, Python allows far too much freedom in being able to change > anything at any time. You're welcome to that opinion. I don't see you present a reason why it should affect anyone else's opinion of Python, though. > Yet Python has to assume 100% of the time that it could have been > changed. Think of the opportunities for optimising if the probability > was 0%. Such a pity that Python is missing all those opportunities for widespread adoption, by not hewing closer to your preferences. -- \ “That's the essence of science: Ask an impertinent question, | `\ and you're on the way to the pertinent answer.” —Jacob | _o__) Bronowski, _The Ascent of Man_, 1973 | Ben Finney