Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.023 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'here?': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'tool.': 0.16; 'ignore': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'fix': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(in': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; '---': 0.24; 'source': 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'skip:g 30': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'plain': 0.33; 'sense': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'false': 0.36; 'impression': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'so,': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'problems.': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'tell': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'viruses': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'protection': 0.63; 'real': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'here': 0.66; 'antivirus': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'results': 0.69; 'noise': 0.84; 'received:2': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: pyflakes best practices? Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 01:50:39 +0100 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-2-98-205-170.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140529-0, 29/05/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1401411041 news.xs4all.nl 2829 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53104 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:72268 On 30/05/2014 01:13, Roy Smith wrote: > We've recently started using pyflakes. The results seem to be similar > to most tools of this genre. It found a few real problems. It > generated a lot of noise about things which weren't really wrong, but > were easy to fix (mostly, unused imports), and a few plain old false > positives which have no easy "fix" (in the sense of, things I can change > which will make pyflakes STFU). > > So, what's the best practice here? How do people deal with the false > positives? Is there some way to annotate the source code to tell > pyflakes to ignore something? > I was under the impression that pyflakes was configurable. It it isn't I'd simply find another tool. Having said that if you don't get better answers here try gmane.comp.python.code-quality. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com