Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.026 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:PyPI': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'random': 0.14; 'bsd': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'ignoring': 0.16; 'license"': 0.16; 'license;': 0.16; 'sad': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'code.': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; '(in': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'instance,': 0.24; 'interpret': 0.24; 'tend': 0.24; 'text.': 0.24; 'header': 0.24; 'versions': 0.24; 'file.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'source': 0.25; '(see': 0.26; 'second': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'somewhere': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'generally': 0.29; 'forgot': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'agreed.': 0.31; 'trivial': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'option': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.33; "can't": 0.35; 'common': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'dies': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'clear': 0.37; 'whatever': 0.38; 'short': 0.38; 'called': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'ian': 0.60; 'manually': 0.60; 'full': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'name': 0.63; 'him,': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; '30,': 0.65; 'license': 0.66; 'judge': 0.68; 'touch': 0.74; 'absolutely': 0.87; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=QjTikeQs9nrVBlFi0hMbwBK0c6SFLB7hl3Lvj3Vi/D4=; b=Lw7oH9oVBplIW3u5OwUpxsxClh6wA5bAH/nxttApUgROYKWrbDZVOVBGRUluacToqW HP//u3T3lZ64O+qZG5xkuGgtu2MHeZl3LheDm2cFDKf6Ad1nSduxm89tE2zcRvmN9/t9 Nv2rNQW61T0DCrs6+FNrwjyIGUnE0IzstleImcZL6tWyh5oUXWXaBuy5MhO4MDHNWezI Gr+ZxHyUVCnIp2Lq43bUqBFnx7UYsRT4qA4oEmvxdFGfmspsoBYrVs9hhyqS6HfOBI/6 uXW7G19zcQuV59lvWMgqzC28tP0K8PFhk3MlAyZ+6m8phXYyJ8V1+tU8Owd0aiJVi2uR gy7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.92.193 with SMTP id s1mr10418165vcm.34.1401409578746; Thu, 29 May 2014 17:26:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1fgpxn70wxrg0.1rv21r79ohz7z$.dlg@40tude.net> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:26:18 +1000 Subject: Re: Forking PyPI package From: Chris Angelico Cc: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1401409586 news.xs4all.nl 2841 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40106 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:72264 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> If you absolutely can't get in touch with him, the only option is to >> go back to the original protocol and manually reimplement it, >> completely ignoring this code. It's sad but true; some code dies >> because of a trivial thing like "Oops, I forgot to actually say that >> this is MIT-licensed". > > The second part of that is that the code should actually *include* the > license text. Just writing "BSD license" somewhere on the website or > in package metadata is annoyingly common but somewhat questionable in > how a judge might interpret it. For instance, there at least four > different versions of the BSD license; which one did you mean? Agreed. I tend to have a file called README or LICENSE in the main source code directory that has license terms (in the case of a README, the license will follow whatever else there is to say); that's generally clear enough, without having to put a header on every single source file. I like to put both a short name and the full license text in there (see eg https://github.com/Rosuav/Yosemite for which I use the MIT license), so it's independent of random web sites - having nothing but a link to the license text makes it that bit more vulnerable. ChrisA