Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: [OT] A doubt about a doubt Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:26:14 +0200 Organization: None Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <387506b1-b645-4907-a45c-81a8c3043099@googlegroups.com> <0c3cfac3-2e66-4341-ab51-1517cb13f1a4@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de uZtJDADnd0jqBZ4ZfgR8/QEMawD4ZP48owsRdvZsWQQA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'incorrect': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'ah,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'shifts': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'correct': 0.28; 'doubt': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.37; 'someone': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd97b7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <387506b1-b645-4907-a45c-81a8c3043099@googlegroups.com> <0c3cfac3-2e66-4341-ab51-1517cb13f1a4@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:106997 Rustom Mody wrote: > I have a doubt: > Is it incorrect to correct someone when they are incorrect? No doubt about it. Everyone's a winner... > [Sprinkle a "politically" on the above to taste ] Ah, contradictio in adiecto. That shifts it to definitely maybe.