Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'statically': 0.07; 'python': 0.07; 'rebuild': 0.09; 'extension': 0.14; 'files).': 0.16; 'received:80.67': 0.16; 'received:80.67.31': 0.16; 'received:ispgateway.de': 0.16; 'then:': 0.16; 'static': 0.16; 'true,': 0.19; 'modules': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.22; 'cases': 0.25; 'linked': 0.25; 'load': 0.28; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'depends': 0.29; 'certainly': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.31; 'martin': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'some': 0.37; 'but': 0.38; 'could': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; 'received:de': 0.39; 'ever': 0.65; 'serious': 0.78; 'lose': 0.84 Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 14:49:13 +0200 From: "Martin v. Loewis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110402 Icedove/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python To: Ryan Kelly Subject: Re: minimal python27.dll? References: <4DB8774C.9080400@v.loewis.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: martin@v.loewis.de Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1304254162 news.xs4all.nl 32470 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:50339 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:4390 > I have vague recollections that pythonXY.dll could not be statically > linked on Windows, or that doing so causes some serious loss of > functionality. Was this ever true, and is it still? You'll have to rebuild Python to make use of static linkage, of course, but then: it is certainly possible. The main functionality that you lose is the ability to load extension modules (.pyd files). Whether that's a serious loss or not depends on your application - in cases where you want static linkage, you can often accept not being able to do dynamic linkage. Regards, Martin