Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!rt.uk.eu.org!feed.xsnews.nl!border-2.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'exception': 0.03; '#if': 0.05; '*args,': 0.07; 'function,': 0.07; 'lines.': 0.07; 'wrapper': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '**kwargs):': 0.09; 'alternatives': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'tends': 0.09; 'valueerror': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; '__lt__(self,': 0.16; 'conditional': 0.16; 'original:': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip.t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'subject:patch': 0.16; 'subject:possible': 0.16; 'tweak': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'all,': 0.21; '"",': 0.22; 'stopping': 0.22; 'patch': 0.24; 'raise': 0.24; 'idea': 0.24; 'pass': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '(most': 0.27; 'replace': 0.27; 'there.': 0.28; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'actual': 0.28; 'run': 0.28; 'arguments.': 0.29; 'factor': 0.29; 'marc': 0.29; 'subject:like': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'skip:s 30': 0.33; 'function.': 0.33; 'traceback': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'code:': 0.33; 'changed': 0.34; 'conditions.': 0.35; 'false': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'copying': 0.38; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'apply': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'kind': 0.61; 'dear': 0.66; 'subject:this': 0.84; 'x):': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Is it possible monkey patch like this? Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:35:54 +0100 Organization: None References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5084b4fd.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: KNode/4.7.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 71 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1355834069 news.xs4all.nl 6938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43014 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:35052 Marc Aymerich wrote: > Dear all, > I want to monkey patch a method that has lots of code so I want to avoid > copying all the original method for changing just two lines. The thing is > that I don't know how to do this kind of monkey patching. > > Consider the following code: > > class OringinalClass(object): > def origina_method(self, *args, **kwargs): > ... > if some_condition(): # This condition should be changed > raise SomeException > ... > if some_condition(): > ... > #if some_condition(local_variable): # This condition should be > #added > # raise SomeException > ... > > > Is it possible to tell Python to run the original method without stopping > when an exception is raised? No. > so I can catch them on a wrapper method and > apply my conditional there. > > Any other idea on how to monkey patch those two conditionals ? One of the cleanest alternatives is to factor out the condition in the original class and then use a subclass: class Original: def method(self, *args, **kw): self.check_condition(...) ... def check_condition(self, ...): if condition: raise SomeException class Sub(Original): def check_condition(self, ...): pass If you insist on monkey-patching possible solutions depend on the actual conditions. If some_condition() is a function, replace that function. If it is actually an expression tweak the arguments. E. g: >>> class Original: ... def method(self, x): ... if x < 0: raise ValueError ... print x * x ... >>> Original().method(-2) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "", line 3, in method ValueError >>> class Int(int): ... def __lt__(self, other): return False # a blunt lie ... >>> Original().method(Int(-2)) 4 This tends to get complex quickly, so in the long run you will not be happy with that approach...