Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'patterns': 0.04; 'case.': 0.05; 'mrab': 0.05; 'try:': 0.07; 'val': 0.07; 'dict': 0.09; 'function:': 0.09; 'key)': 0.09; 'visited': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; "wouldn't": 0.11; ':-)': 0.13; 'd[key]': 0.16; 'indirect,': 0.16; 'key):': 0.16; 'key/value': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'node,': 0.16; 'reliably': 0.16; 'set()': 0.16; 'to:name:python list': 0.16; 'true:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'tim': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'regardless': 0.21; 'keyerror:': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'setting': 0.26; 'checking': 0.27; 'first,': 0.27; 'guess': 0.27; 'tree': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; '>>>>': 0.29; 'chase': 0.29; 'depth': 0.29; 'dictionary': 0.29; 'node': 0.29; 'search.': 0.29; 'subject:some': 0.29; 'no,': 0.29; 'objects': 0.29; 'expect': 0.31; 'december': 0.32; 'problem.': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'except': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'one,': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'delete': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'kind': 0.61; 'harder': 0.65; 'visiting': 0.79; "'if": 0.84; 'cycles.': 0.84; 'oscar': 0.84; 'do:': 0.91; 'angel': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+fPRQZmdsWZ1cGbT1DkzejAy6YhyBFEaGao8zsV9Ieg=; b=DAVS37QA4z/QK0oYfZMCZu5e7SKpk6qdGJBeY1IjDf36CdYvTz00gk4ZLOdPbdDQ/j bmobS1jL/wGjTgDQlQYb/i9DO3ySZoqx4FvWthlpmL1sNGhsesQ9twI3UUGfWLpdJi8v 8ggwI4Ehh7tst+nbOfHc31W4rPmNScPxPj7LkEhyaMSBOtTRk85n6h37+WyL5bNVuv1J 9ssMdLNBASQDqTAlCTBip2X7Ji+4Tn5WWybw13JVnPnhuiEtvXdd7U/gtA8Bpe+DlCF7 pgILgcsAne6qPzVGRbNGWmsna9xo34PEbXvuCO26XyOnk0pDk3ICV5Q0BtA1j9i5Ve1J UxHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50CFA5E7.7020701@mrabarnett.plus.com> References: <943dbf16-1cd1-4844-a666-d8863f5941f8@googlegroups.com> <50CF59DE.6080608@lightbird.net> <50CF64B8.6010305@tim.thechases.com> <50CF8FBC.9000100@lightbird.net> <50CF95FB.6060800@davea.name> <50CFA5E7.7020701@mrabarnett.plus.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:44:53 +0000 Subject: Re: Delete dict and subdict items of some name From: Oscar Benjamin To: Python List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 77 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1355793957 news.xs4all.nl 6976 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33659 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:35033 On 17 December 2012 23:08, MRAB wrote: > On 2012-12-17 22:00, Dave Angel wrote: >> On 12/17/2012 04:33 PM, Mitya Sirenef wrote: >>> On 12/17/2012 01:30 PM, Tim Chase wrote: >>>> On 12/17/12 11:43, Mitya Sirenef wrote: >>>>> On 12/17/2012 12:27 PM, Gnarlodious wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello. What I want to do is delete every dictionary key/value >>>>>> of the name 'Favicon' regardless of depth in subdicts, of which >>>>>> there are many. What is the best way to do it? >>>>> >>>>> Something like this should work: >>>>> >>>>> def delkey(d, key): >>>>> if isinstance(d, dict): >>>>> if key in d: del d[key] >>>>> for val in d.values(): >>>>> delkey(val, key) >>>> >>>> Unless you have something hatefully recursive like >>>> >>>> d = {} >>>> d["hello"] = d >>>> >>>> :-) >>> >>> >>> True -- didn't think of that..! >>> >>> I guess then adding a check 'if val is not d: delkey(val, key)' >>> would take care of it? >>> >> No, that would only cover the self-recursive case. If there's a dict >> which contains another one, which contains the first, then the recursion >> is indirect, and much harder to check for. >> >> Checking reliably for arbitrary recursion patterns is tricky, but >> do-able. Most people degenerate into just setting an arbitrary max >> depth. But I can describe two approaches to this kind of problem. >> > Wouldn't a set of the id of the visited objects work? Of course it would. This is just a tree search. Here's a depth-first-search function: def dfs(root, childfunc, func): '''depth first search on a tree calls func(node) once for each node''' visited = set() visiting = OrderedDict() visiting[id(root)] = it = iter([root]) while True: try: node = next(it) except StopIteration: try: node, it = visiting.popitem() except KeyError: return key = id(node) if isinstance(node, dict) and key not in visited: func(node) visiting[key] = it = iter(childfunc(node)) visited.add(key) Now you can do: dfs(my_dict_tree, lambda x: x.pop('Favicon', None)) Although I wouldn't bother with the above unless I had some reason to expect possible cycles. Oscar