Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Ian Kelly Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:17:09 -0600 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <834b1cce-38dd-474c-8915-4ff1cd6b27ec@googlegroups.com> <57846636$0$1621$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <06f2dedb-ce7a-4ca8-9fe8-8dba36f3d3ba@googlegroups.com> <76762c79-a85d-48f1-8132-5decd10ce4f1@googlegroups.com> <57874385$0$1501$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87shvccing.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87vb08xh3g.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de GA2BgcNGzBRnHIomEqt2cQPoEvnSblrPzK39+ttHL3Fw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.050 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'english,': 0.09; 'thu,': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:mail- oi0-x22a.google.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>': 0.18; 'am,': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; '14,': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'url:wikipedia': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'url:wiki': 0.30; 'skip:[ 10': 0.31; 'computing': 0.32; 'common': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'skip:& 10': 0.37; 'wrong': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'url:en': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'term': 0.60; 'american': 0.69; 'jul': 0.72; 'to:name:python': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=xvreD1md87aYsKjltqzrlOz7M5QiPDXTVq4DOBExa5w=; b=FL4unV8CHd7JeueYsUY7SnKmCyhiA7iE3DLDHu1ZcVIjyDen6BakvdKRd1Sq6zRv+M a0So6HHUqaZr2Qy3qS2yis894RE14Xy3CKviyBuqLXA1cdO7766rptL8xeBYc4vnRdeM V3KESZoeiUDAuGNWLpPuC8NQ8DRFd+aDX+yyvA6iefk8NNX9YXLWy7IEjPSyt/O7tf/H wsfETJmGS0e1qVWINUAcjU4nSKkVAEgJTF1brkZQ4euaLyLDuzCKGah9wG0cbYyCq72j AfcYPsWMNAdpGstFC3rApqHRXsZfcwnYbh0kyX2KRhyKx0283lsS/miS8qW5U4+2Ri2l WfEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=xvreD1md87aYsKjltqzrlOz7M5QiPDXTVq4DOBExa5w=; b=BMWx6Uz/7w17POmflLcuAkCvIjAVFuO1JQYPD9Bo4TsDMUJnDfHn8GFGZ/E25t3EgP 6AKTlSzxTC+ulbQV7naAGTAp3TuYKMASHnRHh5VjEnZ+HkdGkhrW+g/I+fUf+t9EUWmo JPOwBCgzH2n6Pg0WyLsyO4DJg2IjzqCHNO5jkIRlrpVfma1QUNSFknd1k0WxZqWQRexi FD2FO3/vw6DIYHGKCGEYJ8p2NE2UD5fJl1AkQUSIdrkkOdWx8Wm+KHajwFKN1yDSWnEa iBg+FGanRdUo8Xg+N1hO8l2FfnbCfV4hb2ml/z2+YtZkSweW7F9qaZNFoefa0nLRDyxa ugRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIPATXsE5kPu9X3RyhWCYOlCeHjPYm56FUyJJHoWoxAUPTGMyJhYakI69eBbHKCxoTIIOggRupIYibN8A== X-Received: by 10.157.37.119 with SMTP id j52mr10864107otd.115.1468541829234; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:17:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87vb08xh3g.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <834b1cce-38dd-474c-8915-4ff1cd6b27ec@googlegroups.com> <57846636$0$1621$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <06f2dedb-ce7a-4ca8-9fe8-8dba36f3d3ba@googlegroups.com> <76762c79-a85d-48f1-8132-5decd10ce4f1@googlegroups.com> <57874385$0$1501$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87shvccing.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87vb08xh3g.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:111455 On Jul 14, 2016 11:37 AM, "Marko Rauhamaa" wrote: > > Ian Kelly : > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > >> In American English, the original word for [significand] seems to > >> have been mantissa (Burks[1] et al.), and this usage remains > >> common in computing and among computer scientists. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significand#Use_of_.22mantissa.22> > > > > Just because it's already common to use the wrong term doesn't mean > > the usage should be promulgated further. > > Where do you get the idea that the common usage is "wrong?" What do you > use as a standard? Is it "wrong" to consider some usages "wrong"? By what standard? I'm not interested in arguing over philosophy, so I won't.