Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.05; 'say,': 0.05; 'responding': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'suggest': 0.14; 'argument.': 0.16; 'emacs,': 0.16; 'subject:user': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'pfxlen:0': 0.19; 'code,': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'text,': 0.24; 'paul': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'thus': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'writes:': 0.31; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'next': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'tools,': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'between': 0.67; 'subject:recommended': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=iXHQZ8VJKabC8Jmqq8E39kq0tXga+OvSUSTOWQPSVEc=; b=BbKVSSf0swy2FkQeLWny4pWIURycxPazL0nZn/koCDxSOfwSL547qfIT5d63bGtWn5 4YhOfQmUOsJmSnyAolYigQUtvA8bXGrjc1IF3oxMxD8FGLU/SUZoSBfUon6j/c4+MtH1 TK6NltICqwT0NOComOhziujA28/gVZLpAfqSvnFoAMc75+VoCd8wjy9JJh5TwTTJGYWt ooPm01t47YbbRFOjjbpaB1wT5LyZfCzy7kinYoBR+oa+iNX8bMvhxcdKkVT+14Yps0x5 3ZY/weZSSav4VOkfdpPPQdfI6BGKIoWPEwCxRqCBzizHnz5FqSShska/BSF/ljtRmGEA ybfA== X-Received: by 10.112.14.102 with SMTP id o6mr379802lbc.28.1379306586502; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:43:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <87vc26oxdd.fsf@no-fixed-abode.cable.virginmedia.net> References: <091bbe36-8cf9-412f-b7e9-2b3cc89dd363@googlegroups.com> <7wppse2aak.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87vc26oxdd.fsf@no-fixed-abode.cable.virginmedia.net> From: Joshua Landau Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 05:42:26 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DZFP8smu_lbtWewvUTp-X_g1IBE Subject: Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? To: Paul Rudin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1379306593 news.xs4all.nl 15984 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59596 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:54200 On 12 September 2013 16:47, Paul Rudin wrote: > Joshua Landau writes: > >> If the time learning a set of tools is enough to make the choice >> between tools, I suggest avoiding, say, Vim. > > That's a big if. > > If you expect to spend a lot of time editing text, code, etc. over the > next few years then it's definitely learning at least one of vim or > emacs to a reasonable degree of competency. You misunderstood my argument. I was trying to say that because people are willing to put the time in to learn Vim and Emacs, there's already a precedent that the time spent *isn't* enough to make the choice between tools, and thus the argument I was responding to was wrong.