Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Ethan Furman Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:24:24 -0700 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <834b1cce-38dd-474c-8915-4ff1cd6b27ec@googlegroups.com> <7fcc8c21-106f-41d4-a5ba-409f3b54a56d@googlegroups.com> <5783c91e$0$1622$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5783D63F.5040307@stoneleaf.us> <578438B8.9020902@stoneleaf.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de QHog2cEJxhzg3fBEAK4LVwd1oIEajl6YkKjzXWI+o72A== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'consistency.': 0.09; 'degree,': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'gregory': 0.16; 'imposing': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'said.': 0.16; 'thinking,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'integer': 0.18; 'saying': 0.22; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'specify': 0.27; 'agreed.': 0.29; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'lets': 0.33; "isn't": 0.35; 'cases': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'format': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'course': 0.62; 'maths': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.91; 'furman': 0.91 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <578438B8.9020902@stoneleaf.us> X-Mailman-Original-References: <834b1cce-38dd-474c-8915-4ff1cd6b27ec@googlegroups.com> <7fcc8c21-106f-41d4-a5ba-409f3b54a56d@googlegroups.com> <5783c91e$0$1622$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5783D63F.5040307@stoneleaf.us> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:111305 On 07/11/2016 04:47 PM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Ethan Furman wrote: >> I will readily admit to not having a maths degree, and so of course to >> me saying the integer 123 has a precision of 5, 10, or 99 digits seems >> like hogwash to me. > > Seems to me insisting that the number after the dot be > called "precision" in all cases is imposing a foolish > consistency. That isn't what I said. > To my way of thinking, the format string just lets you > specify up to two numbers, the interpretation or which > is up to to format concerned. Agreed. -- ~Ethan~