Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Welle Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Interfacing Fortran applications Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:55:46 +0200 Organization: MB-NET.NET for Open-News-Network e.V. Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <7klg6bxlt8.ln2@news.c0t0d0s0.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-088-066-001-075.pools.arcor-ip.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: gwaiyur.mb-net.net 1402390803 18794 88.66.1.75 (10 Jun 2014 09:00:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@open-news-network.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:00:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-No-Archive: Yes Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:73077 Hello, Sturla Molden writes: > On 09/06/14 14:24, Michael Welle wrote: >>> If you are to rewrite the Fortran app you can just as well use f2py from >>> NumPy. >> a rewrite of the application isn't possible. That would require >> knowledge about what the used algorithms are, why they are implemented >> as they are, that would require extensive testing with test cases that >> don't exist. > > You are ok with adding sockets and IPC to a Fortran app, but using > f2py is off limits because it requires a rewrite? Sorry, this doesn't > make any sense. But it's your problem, I don't care what you decide to > do. at least there is still enough freedom in the world to let one make his own choices in some areas. Regards hmw -- biff4emacsen - A biff-like tool for (X)Emacs http://www.c0t0d0s0.de/biff4emacsen/biff4emacsen.html Flood - Your friendly network packet generator http://www.c0t0d0s0.de/flood/flood.html