X-Received: by 10.224.65.6 with SMTP id g6mr7761733qai.4.1365830731437; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.214.36 with SMTP id nx4mr126142igc.6.1365830731285; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!ca1no43277611qab.0!news-out.google.com!ef9ni31353qab.0!nntp.google.com!ca1no43277607qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.527.1365781666.3114.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=123.192.32.215; posting-account=5JdMBQoAAABHnS4mjpqEzxnmWtgiiVNw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.192.32.215
References: <mailman.429.1365635789.3114.python-list@python.org> <51678b94$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <roy-E3B2B9.10194712042013@news.panix.com> <mailman.527.1365781666.3114.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f22e42d0-1ac7-412f-b1a7-e8325288fdaf@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Functional vs. Object oriented API
From: 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
Cc: python-list@python.org
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 05:25:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:43502

David M Chess=E6=96=BC 2013=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F=
=E4=BA=94UTC+8=E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=8811=E6=99=8237=E5=88=8628=E7=A7=92=E5=AF=AB=
=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> > Roy Smith <r...@panix.com>
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > As part of our initial interview screen, we give
> applicants some small=20
>=20
> > coding problems to do. =C2=A0One of the things we see a lot is what
> you could=20
>=20
> > call "Java code smell". =C2=A0This is our clue that the
> person is really a=20
>=20
> > Java hacker at heart who just dabbles in Python but isn't really fluent=
.
> =C2=A0
>=20
> > ...
>=20
> > It's not just LongVerboseFunctionNamesInCamelCase(). =C2=A0Nor is
> it code=20
>=20
> > that looks like somebody bought the Gang of Four patterns book and
> is=20
>=20

> > that maybe there's a class struggling to be written.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> And I think equally to the point, even if you have
> only data, or only functions, right now, if the thing in question has tha=
t
> thing-like feel to it :) you will probably find yourself with both before
> you're done, so you might as well make it a class now...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> DC

If it is not time-critical and no needs to convert into=20
CYTHON then it does not matter too much.

But a well wrapped class structures with good documents can=20
help others to use the python codes a lot.

If the part is intended to be time-critical in the low level=20
part, then  avoiding seeking 4 levels of methods and properties
inside a loop is helpful in python programs to be executed=20
in the run time.