Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Is vars() the most useless Python built-in ever?
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:14:29 +1300
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <dc6rf8Foel8U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <565cf141$0$1612$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4f0f7fc5-c93a-4223-9c05-e192a8fafbbd@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 3LsUC6jdKA6sCXZK53l+hwEvfNXcBecL/pl/1QX4+yyIas4M1J
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i0l2TiVNffyglOjQKnwgPUZiiS0=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Macintosh/20050711)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <4f0f7fc5-c93a-4223-9c05-e192a8fafbbd@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:99835

Rick Johnson wrote:
> the lie about: "THERE SHOULD BE ONE (AND PREFERABLY ONLY ONE) WAY TO DO
> IT!".

You're misquoting the Zen. It says there should be one
*obvious* way to do it.

-- 
Greg