Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bob Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: What killed Smalltalk could kill Python Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:09:15 GMT Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <54bfd513$0$12978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-Trace: individual.net jC0jwXpCs6i1sOqSsRt3wQTtgYfu8OX0dTIRq2lE6sq45YFBUb X-Orig-Path: BERLIN : news.individual.net Cancel-Lock: sha1:W7oBvH23JWKbc/YV6kv9sA87rcY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:84466 in 734937 20150124 081658 Chris Angelico wrote: >On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Bob Martin wrote: >> http://www.oorexx.org/ >> >> I use ooRexx every day, on Linux mostly, but also available on Windows. > >So the question really is: Why that, as opposed to some other >language? Can you say, in one sentence, what ooRexx has that other >languages don't have? I was a mainframe programmer from 1963 to 2003 and used Rexx from its beginnings in 1981; also on OS/2 and Linux. I've never found anything to replace it, and it's the most readable language.