Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Gregory Ewing Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Decimals and other numbers Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 16:08:24 +1300 Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <54AF405C.6020609@davea.name> <54af9612$0$12995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <54afab5d$0$12976$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net NcEtGfd0Of4APTo0gzPqqwagWis/ED0wtgvwWzThTKxRDFsVef Cancel-Lock: sha1:COMdNeQDKghwS5XyGISdNhJZfRk= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Macintosh/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <54afab5d$0$12976$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:83486 Steven D'Aprano wrote: > I'm just sketching an informal proof. If you want to make it vigorous ^^^^^^^^ I think the usual term is "rigorous", unless the mathematician is taking some kind of stimulant... :-) -- Greg