Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bob Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Python 3 is killing Python Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 07:14:56 BST Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <57ajo9poljjre4c4ig0n0ss8kph8k78lp0@4ax.com> <965lo9tqov049ldm9jlgukcchjonnh1m50@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net JJ97IL42yOJK2aKGr0p26wxj84pyUZ35JU8HfprfbzfwwCUI7/ X-Orig-Path: BERLIN : news.individual.net Cancel-Lock: sha1:ibtnbe/BA0BIe2lAkPs8CcyCGrw= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:72395 in 722944 20140601 124133 Steve Hayes wrote: >On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 07:01:46 BST, Bob Martin wrote: > >>in 722929 20140601 035727 Steve Hayes wrote: >> >>>No, it's a bit like flying in a Boeing 747 rather than a Concorde. The latyer >>>may be later and more technically advanced and flew faster, but no one uses or >>>supports it. >> >>Actually, the Concorde preceded the 747, and wasn't as "technically advanced", >>it was just faster. > >Boeing 747s were in airline service in 1970, Concorde didn't enter service >till 4-5 years later. Concorde design started in the early 50s, 747 mid-to-late 60s.