Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Clive Page Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Program Translation - Nov. 14, 2013 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:46:30 +0000 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Z9mBvm0Bm/O2/Dmi7abvIAbOEvIDWtgm82+dL0dPHe1vhNppS+ Cancel-Lock: sha1:H2AHsR97jQAaFniB6CD9rwthIiw= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.fortran:39258 comp.lang.perl.misc:9975 comp.lang.python:59512 On 14/11/2013 17:36, Gordon Sande wrote: > Indeed! Under NAGWare Fortran it runs to completion with C=all but pulls an > undefined reference when C=undefined is added. > > Lots of obsolete features and other warnings but no compiler error > messages. > > The obvious lessons are that 1. Fortran has very good historical continuity > and 2. the good debugging Fortran compilers do a good job. > > I would also check it out with FTNCHEK as well - it usually finds lots of potential or actual problems with code of this vintage. -- Clive Page