Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Neil Cerutti Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Encoding of surrogate code points to UTF-8 Date: 9 Oct 2013 12:55:47 GMT Organization: Norwich University Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <52540e03$0$29984$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <52548791$0$29984$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5254f594$0$29976$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4b728b1a-cc37-4541-80a2-68335f1d5e5f@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net IdqCnDjfwxMwo/kYRAP3kwt5C9gkQKjdmychP/Wzp3WRE0x/ua Cancel-Lock: sha1:MRvFos1eYnaiGSEAE6OqCytmGYQ= User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1/mm/ao (Win32) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:56484 On 2013-10-09, Ned Batchelder wrote: > On 10/9/13 4:22 AM, wxjmfauth@gmail.com wrote: >> and what Unicode.org does not say is that these coding schemes >> (like any coding scheme) should be used in an exclusive way. > > Can you clarify what you mean by "in an exclusive way"? Ned, pay no attention to the person whalopping that dead horse. -- Neil Cerutti