Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Neil Cerutti Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Date: 23 Aug 2013 13:19:51 GMT Organization: Norwich University Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <4bc4d258-1e12-4e1a-af9c-0019f099612f@googlegroups.com> <7wppt5mb3z.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net feN2UNfWshjxJL+1u0t63g31lIUwjdIB1nJSPVRsfFDMkW6JZF Cancel-Lock: sha1:aNQeBBP7p0o7H3p4kThPTP9XfYU= User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1/mm/ao (Win32) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:52888 On 2013-08-23, Chris Angelico wrote: > I'm aware of that. However, I'm also aware that many people > still read things online, even with a less-than-reliable > internet connection. Hence the question: How many people > actually do use the downloaded docs? Maybe it'd turn out to be > quite high, but it's not an unreasonable question. I use the compiled html/windows help and the integrated with the interpreter html version of the Python docs, both downloaded and installed for easy access. -- Neil Cerutti